Or, The Mali that can say “No”
A dramatic shift has been taking shape in Mali, and two recent events suggest that it is now irreversible.
One: the massive rallies in Bamako and dozens of other cities and towns throughout the country (as well as in the Malian diaspora) on Friday, 14 January. The last gatherings this large helped precipitate a coup and led to the resignation of President Ibrahim Boubacar Keita (who died today at age 76). This time, however, the motive was different. These gatherings were officially a display of national unity in the face of ECOWAS economic sanctions. Unofficially, they underscored broad public support for Mali’s transitional government (echoing polls late last year)–and showed that a great many Malians are fed up with France, the UN, and ECOWAS. Watching untold thousands of fellow citizens joining together, many rally participants said that they’d never been prouder of their country.
Two: the day after the rallies, Prime Minister Choguel Kokalla Maïga gave an interview on Malian state television. In the course of 80 free-flowing minutes, he listed the priorities for his transitional government, framing them as demands that “the people” had expressed (notably through the recent Assises Nationales de la Refondation):
- Restoring security
- Fighting corruption and impunity
- Establishing the infrastructure necessary to make elections transparent and credible
- Reforming national laws and institutions
- Implementing the peace accord “in a smart way” (i.e., without partitioning the country)
If this list is unremarkable (who could oppose any of these priorities?), Maïga’s populist tone was more significant: he evoked “the people” constantly, and in a way that I haven’t heard a Malian official do since the previous junta in 2012. It was a textbook display of populism marked by three primary fixations.
First, past greatness. “Mali is a land of dignity. It is a land with a long history. It is a land in which Africa recognizes itself,” Maïga said. Resistance to outside interference is a major part of that history. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, according to the prime minister, it took French military forces 38 years to complete their conquest of the territory that eventually became Mali–far longer than they needed to conquer other parts of the continent. “We are not a people that can be made into vassals, that can be enslaved by proxy–and that is what is happening today,” Maïga stated. After independence, Mali became a pillar of regional cooperation, helping establish ECOWAS itself in 1975 (“ECOWAS was born in Mali,” he claimed).
Second, in contrast to this glorious history, present grievance and national humiliation. “Today we’ve become the sick man, the laughingstock of the region,” Maïga lamented to his interviewer. Describing his government’s negotiations with ECOWAS, he claimed that Mali had been constantly disrespected and treated “like a less-than-nothing.” He made repeated references to the humiliation he said Mali’s people had been subjected to.
Third, threats posed by external forces. Maïga characterized the crisis and conflict that Mali has endured for the past 10 years as something “imposed on us.” And he was far more direct than any previous Malian leader in identifying France as the primary culprit. After Maïga referred to ECOWAS as a puppet of a certain non-African power, the interviewer prodded him to be more specific. The prime minister went on to accuse France of inciting Tuareg separatists against Mali, and of using the fight against terrorism as a pretext to destabilize the country and its government. This is the real aim of ECOWAS sanctions, he claimed: “When we look closely, we see that the goal of these sanctions is the destabilization of the Malian state. There is no doubt.”
Allegations of French recolonization loomed large in the interview. Around the 48 minute mark, Maïga cited a book by French journalist Laurent Larcher. “This will send a chill down your spine,” he said before paraphrasing a French general: “We came here 100 years ago. We left 60 years ago. We have come back for 100 years,” the general supposedly told his troops in 2016. “Draw your own conclusions,” the prime minister said.
Chilling words, indeed–only the actual quote doesn’t read quite as the prime minister remembered. In Au Nom de la France ? Les Non-Dits de Notre Diplomatie (2018), Larcher records General Patrick Brethous, Operation Barkhane’s commander, as saying, “We came 100 years ago, and we left 50 years ago. They [Africans] called us back two years ago. We are back here, with them and behind them, for a while [pour un moment]!”
I used to have arguments with people (mostly Malians) about this sort of thing. I would have built upon Maïga’s misquotation to contend that France lacked the sinister intent that they attributed to it. I repeatedly made similar arguments over the years on this blog.
After last week’s rallies, however, I don’t see the point of such arguments anymore. It matters little whether the general said “pour 100 ans” or “pour un moment” (or even “pour longtemps,” as Brethous reportedly said on another occasion). Outcomes outweigh intentions: France has had troops in Mali for nine years now, and things keep getting worse. Prime Minister Maïga makes some dubious assertions, but as he evokes the sort of conspiracies that his predecessors avoided talking about in public, a lot of Malians appear to be backing him. France having lost the information war in Mali, as I pointed out recently, I don’t see how it can become a trusted partner. It’s hard to imagine a Malian leader ever again allowing (let alone inviting) France to take a major role in Mali–whether in military, political, or economic affairs. That era is over, and few Malians will regret its passing.
For nearly a decade, Maïga noted, insecurity has ratcheted up in Mali despite the international community’s presence–or perhaps, he implied, because of it. Without exactly denying rumors about Wagner Group mercenaries, he cast his government’s Russia embrace pragmatically: “I don’t care if the cat is black or white, so long as it catches mice,” he said, quoting Deng Xiaoping.
I doubt that Russian cats will prove good mouse-catchers in Mali. But what if real sovereignty means the freedom to make one’s own mistakes, and to say “No” to whomever one wishes?
Postscript, 17 January: Statistician Sidiki Guindo surveyed 1345 Bamako residents between 14 and 16 January on their attitudes toward Mali’s transitional government, ECOWAS sanctions, France, Russia, and many other questions. Download the full results:
Great article — as usual you have an excellent reading on what goes on in Mali.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
Perhaps it is the day we finally give up on Mali, real change can start.
Jose, we followed France 🇫🇷 for almost 10 years in a war that’s not getting any better. Now, let’s try Russia 🇷🇺, too. What is wrong with that? Like Mandela said, “your enemy doesn’t have to become my enemy.” A true conspiracy theorist is the one who believes that anyone who holds an opposing view to his or hers is being brainwashed or is a conspiracy theorist. Please respect the sovereignty of Mali 🇲🇱.
Why are you so interested in the one misquotation? Why not the multiple quotations he gave throughout his interview? I will be glad to hear a counter argument for all of them. But remember this, tu peux toujours trouver une bête noire. Whether it’s 100 years or not, it doesn’t matter. What matters is the interpretation we all can attribute to it. It shows once again who you are trying to serve, sir! I’m listening to more counter arguments.
Jose, c’est qui ?
I don’t know who he is except that it’s under the article, “source: Jose Luenga…”
So, I thought this statement is coming from him. Maybe it was just for the map 🗺.
Thank you for fixing it. It was confusing.
Thanks Bruce, I hope you’re right that there’s no going back.
ECOWAS has managed to do what no Malian leader has been able to do : unite the Malian people.
Thank you for this excellent analysis. The people do recognize France as being behind the ECOWAS sanctions and are nearly unanimous in their support for the Government for achieving the five points listed in your post. It also recognizes that France has done long term and irreparable damage to its reputation in Mali. (This should serve as a warning to the OECD countries who blindly follow whatever course France chooses.) It notes that Mali is charting its own course. It should be noted that Choguel Maiga wrote the book on the “Rebellions in Northern Mali” and is well-grounded in its history and able to deal with the problems of the north and those inherent in the Peace Accord as drafted. Congratulations for succinctly summarizing where Mali stands as one people in support of change.
Bruce, you can’t help it. Can you? Did your pertinent analysis of Choguel’s populist strategies need to turn into this insistence on brushing off the expression of the Malian experiential knowledge of the French colonial thinking and actions in Mali? As one of our popular maxims states, “It is easier to wake up someone who is sleeping than someone who pretends to be asleep.” Your insistence on “conspiracy theories” being the basis of Malians’ denunciations of the French colonial mindset and actions in our country is to the limit an insult to our intelligence. It reminds me of adepts of colorblind ideologies in the US who insist on “proof” of the persistence of racism despite an abundance of such proof. I am not accusing you of racism since I know you are not. I make the analogy simply because you have been on a similar path of denial of Malians’ claims of the persistence of the French colonial presence in Malian affairs. It is not a secret that the French government is colluding with some Tuaregs in Northern Mali, including terrorists, and this collusion is not done in the best interest of Mali. It clearly serves some other purposes. How difficult is it to imagine whose purposes it serves?
Well said! Hi 👋 5 from Washington State here.